← Back to Treatments & Tools

MY EXPERIENCE / HISTORICAL ACCOUNT

Spinal cord stimulation: false hope for me

My archived account of expecting a major breakthrough, navigating implanted stimulation and further procedures, and learning that a treatment can be promising for others yet not deliver what I hoped for.

The hope behind the decision

After years of difficult-to-control pain, I wanted something that might give me more of my life back. In my original website account, I described being offered a Medtronic spinal cord stimulator trial around 2008–2009. I hoped the treatment could lessen pain and make everyday living and work more manageable.

That hope was real. So was the disappointment I eventually wrote about.

What happened in my experience

My archived story describes multiple stimulator-related procedures, including further surgery by 2011. I reported that the stimulation did not provide the consistent relief I had hoped for and that using the device could sometimes feel uncomfortable or worsen my nerve pain.

I also documented difficulties with its battery and charging during that historical period. These details are part of my account; they are not a description of what every spinal cord stimulator does or the current condition of my device.

“I had done a lot of research on the device but at the same time I was also hoping for something to give me my life back.”— Adapted only for a spelling correction from my original account

Why I called the chapter “False Hope”

Because I was searching for relief, I wanted to believe that one procedure could change everything. In the years that followed, that wasn't how my experience unfolded. My story includes frustration, difficult choices, and a lot of uncertainty.

The title expresses my experience. It is not a claim that spinal cord stimulation is ineffective for everyone. People considering it need an individualized discussion of expected benefits, complications, alternatives, and realistic goals with their clinical team.

An important correction about MRI safety

My old article included a blanket warning about MRI scans. That language should not be copied into current medical guidance. MRI eligibility depends on the exact implanted stimulator, leads, components, and the required scanning conditions. An implant's precise status cannot be established from my historic blog writing.

If an MRI is being considered, the treating and radiology teams should review the actual implant information and the applicable device-specific guidelines. Medtronic provides information about MRI eligibility for its spinal cord stimulation systems.

Medical-device safety matters

Do not use this site to decide whether an implant is MRI-safe, whether a battery should be replaced, whether a stimulator should be turned on, or whether surgery is necessary. These require qualified professionals with the correct device records.

What the story means to me

I still want people to do their homework, ask questions, and be involved in treatment decisions. My experience wasn't what I hoped for, but it belongs in the story alongside the things that later helped me regain parts of everyday life.

My goal in sharing it is an honest record—without pretending that one treatment experience is the answer for everyone.